Well, I'm the only one here.

Last 20 Searchengine QueriesUnique Visitors
07 Oct, Mon, 17:44:42 Google: ident inetd enable osx
07 Oct, Mon, 18:06:06 Google: pictures African AMericans mourning
07 Oct, Mon, 18:22:29 Yahoo: alaska fields fireweed lupine picture
07 Oct, Mon, 18:35:24 Google: XSpot
07 Oct, Mon, 18:42:00 Google: bush audio behind closed doors, devious
07 Oct, Mon, 19:05:58 Google: bbedit cvs
07 Oct, Mon, 19:43:29 Yahoo: winona ryder dave grohl
07 Oct, Mon, 20:03:25 Google: brita license agreement
07 Oct, Mon, 20:11:51 Google: "Robert Pirsig" +ebook
07 Oct, Mon, 20:28:11 Yahoo: accent phrase funny
07 Oct, Mon, 20:47:24 Google: png viewer for mc os x
07 Oct, Mon, 20:49:44 Google: "themes for os x"
07 Oct, Mon, 21:14:21 Google: sniffles osx
07 Oct, Mon, 21:21:18 Yahoo: funny german commerical
07 Oct, Mon, 21:33:32 Google: american stereotypes of australia accents slang people sport culture
07 Oct, Mon, 21:44:08 Yahoo: famous JFK quotes - negotiate with terrorism
07 Oct, Mon, 21:51:42 Google: "brooke barnett" hole
07 Oct, Mon, 22:27:30 Yahoo: top grosssing films of all time
07 Oct, Mon, 22:35:00 Google: avantgo palm alternative browser osx
07 Oct, Mon, 22:37:07 Google: lowercase music
Mark has drawn attention to the issue of Google's latest index showing some odd weaknesses. I don't know that I've noticed that, but I can tell you that this set of search referrers stands as far and away the best (ie: most likely to be please the searcher; ie: not a search for porn) set I have ever seen.
randomWalks @randomWalks