high horse
I found this New York Times piece on the Arab media's coverage of the war to be simply stunning. It is dripping in moral outrage over the fact that the Arab media dare to "portray" the war as a killing field, as if carnage and war are concepts alien to each other. The article is also incredible in the way it implies what words like "neutral" and "moderate" mean.
For example:
Sensationalism has not gripped all media. Some mainline government-owned newspapers like the staid Al Ahram in Egypt and two of the privately owned international Arabic papers based in London, Al Hayat and Asharq Al Awsat, have reported the war in neutral language. They show bandaged victims in Iraqi hospitals but not the gory pictures of ripped bodies that fill the pages of their competitors.and
The Arab media's reporting of the war may also drown out the more moderate voices that avoid brutal imagery and metaphors of endless victimization.
So showing that people die in a war in the most savage ways imaginable is "sensational," but a more "neutral" tone is to stop at showing "bandaged victims," as if dropping 2,000 bombs on cities is no more harmful than an injury sustained in a rough game of football. To be "moderate" means to simply ignore that hundreds upon hundreds of civilians have died in some of the most sick ways possible or else been maimed for life.
And yet the American media, supposedly neutral, churns out charming prose such as this:
On the ground, however, the work of the 2,000-pound Mark-84 JDAM bomb -- Joint Direct Attack Munition -- the new workhorse of the U.S. military, is just beginning. In nanoseconds it releases a crushing shock wave and showers jagged, white-hot metal fragments at supersonic speed, shattering concrete, shredding flesh, crushing cells, rupturing lungs, bursting sinus cavities and ripping away limbs in a maelstrom of destruction.
So it's ok to masturbate over JDAMs--"The brutal shock wave, a force that far exceeds the pressure the atmosphere normally applies to the human body, smashes into and explodes body cavities of lesser pressure -- lungs, colon, bowels, even through the sinuses into the skull."--but showing what they do is "sensational."
Ok. I'm glad the Times straightened me out on that one.
originally posted by zagg
Comments
Ugh-- I agree with you 100%, that Times piece is sickening. Instead of blaming the foreign media, they should start wondering which media is really more controlled.
Posted by: Fred | April 4, 2003 1:32 PM
I'm just listening to BBC Radio 4 news and it's hilarious. They are having to go to extraordinary lengths NOT to say outright that the US military's claims of the past two days are complete fabrications. Journalists on the ground at the airport and in the city centre say there is no sign of any US troops. This is termed 'confusion'. Condensed interview:
Presenter: it appears that, in fact, Baghdad airport is not in US hands.
US General: it is.
Presenter: it is not. you're not even there yet.
General: it is. and yes we are.
Presenter (to the listener): what is the reason for this confusion? surely the coalition would not lie. what should one make of this conflicting information ra ra ra?
beautiful. you couldn't make this shit up.
Posted by: gwen | April 5, 2003 7:37 AM
The Propaganda we hear is just pathetic.
And I read that times peice yesterday.
Posted by: tORA | April 5, 2003 8:08 AM