« blogs against war: pings for peace | Main | Peace? »

conscientious objectors?

Now I've heard mutterings about this today on the radio. So where did the article go? On the Sunday Times front page, scroll down to the 'Britons sent home for refusing to fight' link, where, if the page loads, you will get this Error 404 message. Unless you want to read it from outside the UK, in which case you'll be asked to pay an annual subscription fee of £39.99. Bargain!

Comments

Three British soldiers sent home for protesting civilian casualties: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,926135,00.html

a missing story? £39.99? it doesn't surprise me.

the sunday times is owned by news international, which also owns Sky in the UK and Fox in the states. both of which are drooling pro-war channels which talk about all the "stunning weaponry" being dropped on iraq.

i wonder if the sunday times just decided not to have a vaguely anti-war report on their page.

it's not even an anti-war story. it's a story about three soldiers who didn't want to fight and now happen to have shit hot lawyers. the MoD wants to keep it quiet too.

It's also at the Rational Enquirer at http://www.rationalenquirer.org/

thanks for that link!

Dear Reader, I enclose one of the 44 letters in the 'Slave Citizen' document that may be of interest to you. I enclose only one letter. The others are found on the web site direct link to this particular doc is:

Regards - Terence tmalaher@tassie.net.au

~ The true conscientious objector ~

The true conscientious objector is a free man because at all times he heeds God's Commandment and abides in God's Code of Conduct, thus he is not only peaceful, but he is a 'pacifist' and a peacemaker by his living ways. The true conscientious objector 'objects' to the ideology of a 'particular' belief of another or Institution. The true conscientious objector has:

God as their guide and protector.

God's Word as their living deed and way.

For a true pacifist it is 'unconscionable' to be a 'member' of any Institution whose 'officers' and Code of Conduct rules are proven to be of an unconscionable ideology, one that is proven to be in 'opposition' to the Code of Conduct as given for man to follow within 'The Constitution of God.' (Pages 212/213 The Testament of Truth).

Thus one of the 'cornerstones' upon which the Constitution of man was founded, being the 'Act' stating: "The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, - - - the ACT is actually stating:

"If any person on the land finds it unconscionable to fight for, or to seek protection from the King or the 'Institution,' then they are free to walk apart from the Institution without 'let or hindrance,' and this is guaranteed by said 'Act' within the Constitution of said Institution."

Thus it follows that 'such' a person of 'peace' is not within the jurisdiction of any subsequent rules 'raised' by the legislators of 'said' Institution, nor are they within the jurisdiction of any of the 'policing' forces or Courts of said Institution.

They are truly free men heeding God

Any Court that tries to 'overthrow' the basic foundation stone of the 'religious observance' Act within the Constitution is 'questioning' the authority and sovereignty of the Institution they serve, and if they take it upon themselves to 'flaunt' their disregard of the Rule by 'convicting' a man of peace they are seditious and have committed an act of Treason.

Note: Within the 'rules' of the Institution there is a 'clause' saying: "Any person 'bound' within the Constitution of the Institution who either does or attempts to 'question' the sovereign authority of any 'Act' within the Constitution is 'seditious' and will be 'charged' by said Institution." For they are holding its 'sovereignty' in contempt and raising discontent or disaffection amongst 'His Majesty's' subjects. (All those 'belonging to' said Institution).

Thus it 'follows' that any judge or police officer, who 'arrests or punishes' any true conscientious objector who has 'shown' that they walk apart from said Institution, has already committed a 'seditious' act against his own 'State' Institution and, - - - has committed an act of Treason against the State of Heaven for interfering in the life of a person that is deemed to not belong to said Institution.

Mankind needs to now see that no 'King' or 'Institution' owns any 'nation,' and neither do they 'own' any landmass as there were and yet are pre-set conditions in existence, being ownership of said land by God. Thus no Institution of man can lay 'claim' to ownership of any sea or 'shore,' and the free movement of people of any race or 'land' is permitted by God.

Let it here be again said that any 'lands' taken illegally from God by force and now 'held' by force of arms for man or for Institutions of man are being held illegitimately, and all being a 'party to' this 'skulduggery' are to be punished by God and banished to the lower worlds for a time.

~ The 'Slave' Citizen ~

document

God's revelation of 'Slavery' to man & man's Court

page - 1 The 'slave' Citizen page - 5 The 'ordering' Voice

page - 6 The 'two' Masters page - 8 The 'enemy' of the STATE

page - 9 The key to Legitimacy page - 10 The 'Slaver'

page - 13 Abolition of slavery page - 14 Register & Notes

page - 15 Free movement Decree page - 16 The fundamental right

page - 17 The 'Instrument' of God page - 18 The 'officator'

page - 19 The 'fall' of man page - 20 Religious 'belief or belonging'

page - 21 Notes page - 24 Custodial Slavery

page - 25 The game of Cricket page - 26 Judge Crawford

page - 27 Contradictions page - 28 Freedom or Slavery

page - 30 The great deception page - 31 Judicial error & anarchy

page - 32 The ground Rule page - 33 Notes

page - 34 The Law of the Jungle page - 36 The 'rogue' Constitution

page - 37 The conscientious objector page - 38 Death by false assumption

page - 39 The illegitimate Mandate page - 40 The 'policing' Consequence

Plus more

The 'slave citizen doc' is found at

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)